Today, Justice Mellor found that the evidence in the COPA v Wright trial was “overwhelming,” ruling that:
[Read More]Recent Posts
12 reasons why Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto
This week is closing arguments in the seminal COPA v Craig Wright trial. The objective is to prove, once and for all, that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto. On March 12, as part of closing statements, COPA outlined a number of important reasons why Dr Wright simply cannot be... [Read More]
Witnesses speak out against Craig Wright in COPA vs Craig Wright trial; testimony includes never-before-published correspondence with Satoshi Nakamoto
- Dr Adam Back, inventor of proof-of-work system cited in the bitcoin White Paper, testifies against Dr Wright’s claims about who influenced Satoshi;
- Martti Malmi, a Finnish computer scientist who corresponded with Satoshi Nakamoto in 2009 and 2011, testifies that he “communicated with Satoshi, who I believe to be a... [Read More]
“Brazen lies, elaborate false narrative, and forgery on an industrial scale”
Trial started this week in the UK High Court of COPA’s claim, in which it will seek to demonstrate once and for all that Dr Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto, the author of the bitcoin whitepaper.
[Read More]Expert Witnesses for Both COPA and Craig Wright Agree - Wright’s Newly Found Documents are Recent Creations
COPA has introduced new forensic evidence that definitively proves the inauthenticity of several documents that Craig Wright considers crucial to his claim that he is the founder of bitcoin. This was not only the conclusion of the expert COPA retained to forensically examine Wright’s documents, but the conclusion of the... [Read More]